Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract The importance of developing students’ argumentation skills is well established across the curriculum: students should grasp how claims are made and supported in different disciplines. One challenge to follow thereby agree with or critique arguments others, which requires perspective-taking, tracing these other reasons reasoning. This increased when disciplines construct perspective-taking differently. Here, we consider role within between science education pluralistic religious education, where former aims at justification scientific latter both an empathetic understanding religions worldviews, personal We interpretively analyze student data identify salient features strategies argumentation. Data from 324 pupils nine schools explored relation challenges for argumentation, use analysis shows some barriers range could hermeneutically build upon strategies. implications curriculum considered highlighting etic/emic shift, individual subject as them, reflections on this provides a fresh pedagogical perspective science/religions debate made. To end, conclude wider schooling university.
منابع مشابه
Science Anxiety and Gender in Students Taking General Education Science Courses
Earlier studies [Mallow, J. V. (1994). Gender-related science anxiety: A first binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 3: 227–238; Udo, M. K., Ramsey, G. P., Reynolds-Alpert, S., and Mallow, J. V. (2001). Does physics teaching affect gender-based science anxiety? Journal of Science Education and Technology 10: 237–247] of science anxiety in various student cohorts suggeste...
متن کاملRelevance: An Interdisciplinary and Information Science Perspective
Although relevance has represented a key concept in the field of information science for evaluating information retrieval effectiveness, the broader context established by interdisciplinary frameworks could provide greater depth and breadth to on-going research in the field. This work provides an overview of the nature of relevance in the field of information science with a cursory view of how ...
متن کاملMiddle school science students’ dialogic argumentation
Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning are used to analyze students’ small group discourse during the evaluation of a science investigation project. Seventeen triads of middle school students participated in a structured 45-60 minute long interview. The broad set argumentation schemes employed by students, such as argument from sign and argument from consequences, suggests that the aut...
متن کاملPatterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics
This paper presents an analysis of argumentation strategies in news editorials within and across topics. Given nearly 29,000 argumentative editorials from the New York Times, we develop two machine learning models, one for determining an editorial’s topic, and one for identifying evidence types in the editorial. Based on the distribution and structure of the identified types, we analyze the usa...
متن کاملStudents ́ Interests and Interdisciplinary Instruction in Mathematics and Science
This paper presents the research project IFUN Interest and Interdisciplinary Instruction in Science and Mathematics. As researchers in mathematics and science education we are basically interested in how students’ learning and understanding in these subjects might be improved. Many research studies indicate that students’ interest in science and mathematics declines during lower secondary schoo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of religious education
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2199-4625', '1442-018X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-021-00143-9